diff --git a/Comparing-Tower-Defense-vs.-Tower-Rush%3A-What%27s-the-Difference%3F.md b/Comparing-Tower-Defense-vs.-Tower-Rush%3A-What%27s-the-Difference%3F.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a487adb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Comparing-Tower-Defense-vs.-Tower-Rush%3A-What%27s-the-Difference%3F.md
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+
Understanding the fundamental differences between these two styles of play will help you find the right game for your taste.
+
Both genres share a common ancestry, tracing their roots back to custom map modifications in classic RTS titles.
+Traditional Defense Games
+
You do not control any offensive units; your entire strategy revolves around base building and resource management.
+
These games are generally slower-paced, allowing for meticulous planning and pausing the action to rethink strategies.
+Relies on intricate maze building.Upgrades are permanent during the level.Less reliance on reflex actions.
+The Modern Tower Rush
+
Instead of just defending, players must simultaneously manage an offensive assault against a human opponent's base.
+
There is no pausing, no endless waves, and every single deployment decision has immediate, potentially game-ending consequences.
+MechanicDefense Genre[Tower Rush](https://app.globalteachershub.com/read-blog/167204_how-to-deal-with-toxic-players-in-tower-rush.html)Core ObjectiveSurvive all waves without losing livesDestroy the enemy player's main basePrimary InteractionBuilding mazesManaging a deck of cards
+Which Should You Play?
+
If you prefer a relaxed, puzzle-like experience where you can methodically plan your ultimate fortress, stick to the classics.
+
No matter your choice, defending your territory has never been more fun.
\ No newline at end of file